In August 1911, twenty-one-year-old Egon Schiele and his seventeen-year-old companion Walburga "Wally" Neuzil arrived in Neulengbach, a market town in Lower Austria roughly thirty kilometres west of Vienna. A pioneer of the emerging Expressionism movement, he had just been driven out of Krumau, his mother's ancestral town in Bohemia, where neighbours refused to tolerate an unmarried couple living together while local teenage girls visited the painter's studio. Neulengbach, bordered by the Vienna Woods, promised cheap rent and quiet working conditions. Schiele rented a small house at Au 48 and immediately pinned his drawings to the studio and bedroom walls.
The quiet lasted eight months. In early April 1912, thirteen-year-old Tatjana von Mossig, the daughter of a retired Austro-Hungarian naval officer living nearby, ran away from her family. She knocked on the door at Au 48 and begged Schiele and Wally to help her reach her grandmother in Vienna. They sheltered her overnight and accompanied her on the train. When the girl returned home, her furious father went straight to the authorities with accusations of abduction and sexual misconduct.
When the local gendarmerie searched the rented house at Au 48 on April 13, 1912, they seized 125 watercolors and drawings from the walls and work tables, carted them away as criminal evidence of pornography, and locked the twenty-one-year-old artist inside Cell 2 in the courthouse basement; he had no mirror, no easel, and very little light, but he still had pencil, paper, and the stubborn conviction that state suppression of living art was worse than any private transgression.
The prosecution launched investigations into three separate crimes: kidnapping a minor, statutory rape, and public immorality. The first two accusations collapsed almost immediately. A court-ordered medical examination of Tatjana von Mossig confirmed that no sexual contact had occurred, and the charge of abduction was dismissed when testimony proved the girl had sought refuge voluntarily. Yet the investigating judge refused to release Schiele on bail. He remained in the cellar of the Neulengbach Bezirksgericht for twenty-one days of pre-trial detention.
Wally Neuzil was his only regular link to the outside world. She brought him bread, clean linen, graphite pencils, and watercolor pans. On one visit she brought an orange, which sat on the gray prison blanket and inspired a small watercolor dated April 19, 1912, titled Die eine Orange war das einzige Licht (The Single Orange Was the Only Light). Between April 19 and April 27, Schiele produced thirteen works on paper inside the cell, creating some of the rawest watercolor art of the Austrian avant-garde. On April 23, he drew a self-portrait lying on his cot and wrote directly onto the sheet in pencil: "Den Künstler hemmen ist ein Verbrechen, es heisst keimendes Leben morden!" (To inhibit the artist is a crime, it means murdering germinating life!). Ten of those thirteen drawings are now preserved in the permanent collection of the Albertina Museum in Vienna.
The formal trial convened on May 4, 1912. With the felony charges discarded, the proceeding narrowed to Section 516 of the Austrian Penal Code: breach of public morality and decency. The prosecution argued that keeping nude drawings in a private house constituted a public offense because children and tradespeople who entered the studio could see them. Just a decade earlier in Vienna, his mentor had faced parliamentary outrage over his Faculty Paintings, but while established figures had wealthy patrons who could buy back controversial state commissions, Schiele was a penniless twenty-one-year-old in a provincial jail.
During the hearing, the presiding judge picked up one of the seized sheets, a drawing of an erotic female nude that had hung above Schiele's bed. The judge struck a match, lit a candle sitting on his judicial bench, and held the corner of the paper over the open flame until the drawing caught fire and burned to ash in the courtroom. Schiele later recalled the incident in his prison writings: "At the hearing one of my confiscated drawings, the one that had hung in my bedroom, was solemnly burned over a candle flame by the judge in his robes!"
The court found Schiele guilty under Section 516 and sentenced him to three days of strict arrest. Because he had already served twenty-one days awaiting trial, the judge credited his pre-trial custody against the penalty. Schiele walked out of custody on May 7, having spent twenty-four days behind bars. Today, those thirteen Neulengbach prison sheets stand as foundational milestones of Expressionism, capturing the vulnerability of an isolated human body confronting state power.
For decades after Schiele's early death from the Spanish flu in 1918, the exact physical setting of the Neulengbach trial slipped into folklore. In 1922, art critic Arthur Roessler published Egon Schiele im Gefängnis, presenting what he claimed was Schiele's unedited prison diary, though later scholarship by art historian Alessandra Comini revealed that Roessler had padded Schiele's spare notes with theatrical, florid rhetoric about inquisitions and holy martyrs. On August 27, 1963, Comini visited the Neulengbach courthouse while researching her doctoral dissertation. In the cellar, in a space that had been turned into a coal bunker, she located Cell 2 by matching the carved prisoner initials "M H" on the wooden door to the precise pencil sketch Schiele had made of his prison door in April 1912.
0 comments