In 1943, in a psychiatric asylum at Châtenay-Malabry outside Nazi-occupied Paris, Jean Fautrier painted in total secrecy. Through the trees of the surrounding forest of Vallée-aux-Loups, he could hear the regular crack of German firing squads executing hostages. Fautrier did not draw the executions. Instead, he mixed plaster, powder, and oil paint into heavy paste on small sheets of paper, building up thick, mutilated mounds of pigment that he scraped and gouged into anonymous faces. When the resulting series, Otages (Hostages), was exhibited at Galerie René Drouin in Paris in 1945, the French poet Francis Ponge described the surface texture as "a paste of horror."
Three thousand miles away in East Hampton, New York, Jackson Pollock laid a roll of unprimed cotton canvas onto his barn floor. He uncapped commercial liquid enamel paint, picked up a stiffened house-painting brush, and began to fling dark ribbons of fluid across the canvas without letting his tool touch the cotton. By 1950, photographer Hans Namuth captured Pollock suspended above his floor canvases, crouched in physical motion.
To an American collector visiting Europe in the late 1940s, the sight of a Pollock drip canvas and a European gestural painting suggested a single global impulse. In both places, painters had abandoned the geometric precision of pre-war abstraction and the literal figures of realism. In both places, the physical gesture of painting had replaced the pre-planned subject. Yet the impulse was split by geography, scale, and critical warfare.
The Transatlantic Parallel: Why Both Continents Broke Form at Once
Before World War II, geometric order dominated abstract painting. Movements like Cubism and De Stijl had reduced objects to structural planes and primary grids. But the collapse of European political order stripped those clear mathematical formulas of their authority. Painters emerging from the war viewed neat geometric grids as an illusion.
In Manhattan, artists connected to the New York School forged Abstract Expressionism. Driven by monumental scale, raw energy, and existential philosophy, painters like Pollock, Willem de Kooning, and Franz Kline turned the canvas into what critic Harold Rosenberg famously called "an arena in which to act." Within this movement, gestural painting found its specific engine in Action Painting, where the physical mark recorded the artist's immediate psychological state.
In post-war Paris, painters faced identical artistic dilemmas under drastically different physical conditions. Where American painters benefited from spacious Manhattan lofts and cheap industrial canvas rolls, European painters worked in unheated studios surrounded by urban destruction, rationing, and scarce art supplies. German-born painter Wols (Alfred Otto Wolfgang Schulze), who had spent years in French internment camps as an enemy alien, produced tiny watercolor and oil panels stained with ink, scratches, and spreading blots of paint. He died in Paris in 1951 at thirty-eight, leaving behind canvases that looked like raw wounds.
Naming the European Storm: Art Informel and Tachisme
While American critics like Rosenberg and Clement Greenberg fought over the vocabulary of the New York School, French critics launched their own terminology wars to categorize European gestural abstraction.
In 1952, French critic and curator Michel Tapié published the manifesto Un Art Autre (Art of Another Kind) alongside a landmark exhibition at Studio Paul Facchetti in Paris. Tapié used the umbrella term Art Informel to describe an art completely freed from classical composition, traditional form, and geometric premeditation. The French word informel did not mean "informal" in the casual sense; it meant "un-form-ulated" or "lacking in form." Under Tapié's umbrella sat several distinct European tendencies: the raw material impasto of Fautrier and Jean Dubuffet, the lyrical brushwork of Georges Mathieu, and the spontaneous ink stains of Wols.
Two years later, in 1954, rival French critic Charles Estienne pushed a more specific label: Tachisme. Derived from the French word tache (meaning a stain, spot, or blot), the term had originally been used as a slur by traditionalist critic Pierre Guéguen to dismiss spontaneous paint splashes. Estienne adopted the word proudly, using it to define painters whose compositions were built entirely from unmeditated splashes, stains, and calligraphic marks.
French painter Pierre Soulages refused both labels, yet his work epitomized the European masterstrokes of the era. Working with broad wall-painter brushes and black walnut stain, Soulages scraped heavy dark bars onto light grounds, treating black not as an absence of color but as a dense reflective sculpture of light.
Three Movements, Three Distinct Impulses
Though international exhibitions frequently lumped these three currents together, key technical and aesthetic boundaries separated them:
Abstract Expressionism operated as a sweeping American art historical era containing two distinct wings: the gestural velocity of Action Painting and the luminous contemplative expanses of Color Field. Its scale was architectural, designed to engulf the viewer's peripheral vision on vast gallery walls.
Art Informel functioned as the broader European philosophical umbrella. It rejected premeditated structure in favor of raw matter, existential weight, and texture. It embraced regional groups across the continent, including the international COBRA group founded in 1948 by artists from Copenhagen, Brussels, and Amsterdam.
Tachisme formed the specific French painterly style within Art Informel. It focused sharply on the fluid physics of pigment: dripping oil directly from tubes, brushing spontaneous calligraphic lines, and allowing pooling stains of color to dictate the composition.
Jean Dubuffet carried the material logic of Art Informel into raw terrain. Mixing sand, pebbles, asphalt, and varnish into his oil paint in a technique he named haute pâte (thick paste), Dubuffet gouged crude figures into the mortar. His celebration of untamed, non-academic art (which he coined Art Brut) demonstrated how European painters turned away from pre-war refinement to construct a brutal visual language out of raw earth.
When Surrealism gave way to post-war abstraction, artists in New York and Paris arrived at gestural freedom simultaneously. The Americans built expansive canvases of raw kinetic movement; the Europeans carved dense, tactile surfaces out of war-torn matter. Both sides proved that when traditional form collapses, the mark left by the human hand becomes a direct artifact of survival.
0 comments